Thursday, August 27, 2015

A520.3.5.RB - Supportive Communication

Hello leaders! Today’s topic is very pertinent to being a successful leader. We’ll take a look at practicing supportive communication.

In our reading this week, Whetten & Cameron (2011) provided some guidelines that we can review. I’ll discuss opportunities that I see to integrate supportive communication to a greater extent at my organization, too.

Bear in mind that when times are good or the news to deliver is good, most of us are very capable of practicing supportive communication. When it comes to addressing sub-par performance or dealing with personality clashes, maintaining a positive relationship can be a difficult job. The principles are slanted more to the latter situation, but are definitely applicable in the good times, too.

For starters, one must differentiate between coaching and counseling situations.  “In coaching, managers pass along advice and information, or they set standards to help others improve their work skills. In counseling, managers help others recognize and address problems involving their level of understanding, emotions, or personalities. Thus, coaching focuses on abilities, counseling on attitudes.” (Whetten &Cameron, 2011, p. 244)

Being congruent in your communication is a must. I would posit that it is a goal to always strive for, while knowing that complete congruence in communication at work will be nearly unattainable. Be truthful in your message and its delivery. That doesn’t mean be “brutally honest” all the time. People who communicate in that way all the time are generally voted off the island before too long, no matter how “right” they may be.

The next two principles are closely linked. In describing the situation you wish to discuss, use descriptive and problem oriented statements. Said another way, “Get the emotion out of it.” Making an evaluative statement or driving at the attributes of the person will touch emotional nerves and shut down the aural pathways to the other person. They’ll be so busy coming up with retorts they’ll stop listening.

Providing pertinent feedback to indicate that you are paying attention and invested in the conversation is core to a meaningful conversation. Get the cell phone muted, the computer screen blanked, and any other distractions stowed. Provide validation and acknowledgement of the person’s uniqueness and importance. Supportive listening is a skill that also must be practiced. It takes effort to listen to the other person’s entire statement or position without starting to formulate an answer before they are done talking. As soon as you begin formulating an answer, you have stopped listening.

It is incumbent on us, as leaders, to realize we probably do not have all of the information about the situation. Be open to learning during these interactions. Be conscious of how much of the conversation each person is contributing to and strive not to be dominant.

Tied into being descriptive and problem oriented, the need to be specific is mandatory. I think how it would be if the roles were reversed. In fact, I have had managers and teachers who would only say things like, “What you did was incorrect.” That’s all I received for feedback. No hints, clues, or other direction as to what I should work on. Statements like that make for a massively frustrated employee or student. If there is data that can be provided, bring it to the conversation. It may very well be that the other person didn’t know their performance was below par because they have been distracted by something else. Just seeing the data may be enough or it will at least authenticate the need for the conversation.

The discussion should be fluid. Prepare ahead of time (when at all possible) and ensure the topics flow. Jumping around different, seemingly unrelated topics creates barriers to communication. Long pauses while you are trying to put ideas together during the conversation also inhibit good communication. Look like you thought about the issues and are not just unloading on the person and trying to come up with more areas “they could improve” while you have them in front of you.
Take ownership of your statements. You, the manager and leader, want to help your employee. Use the pronoun “I” when stating your observations and reactions. Deferring to “the company” or “we” puts artificial distance between you and your employee.

The last of the principles we read about involves the use of personal management interviews. These are scheduled time periods where the manager and his or her direct reports. The meetings are one-on-one and should serve as opportunities to improve communication. Practicing the other principles during these meetings would be the ultimate goal.

Prior to seeing these principles in print, I was utilizing a majority of them. I am glad to have had the opportunity to review them and to see the various studies that verified the validity of putting them into practice. The principles all require practice to be honed as skills and for understanding where is best utilized.

Given the responsibilities and the privileges of the job I currently have, I need to practice and demonstrate supportive communication every day. I do not believe my team would enjoy the success it does if I had been unsupportive in my communication to date. Are there times when I could do a better job? Of course there have been. I know there will continue to be opportunities to improve in the future, too. The bonus is having had this review to iterate remaining focused on supporting my peoples’ communication.


Whetten, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2011). Developing Management Skills (E. Svendsen Ed. 8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

No comments:

Post a Comment